Get in Touch with AuraPoint

Whether you're a licensed structural engineer who spotted a technical discrepancy in our load path diagrams, an architecture student trying to make sense of lateral force resisting systems, or a civil engineering professional who wants to suggest a topic we haven't covered yet — we want to hear from you. AuraPoint exists to make structural fundamentals genuinely accessible and technically accurate for everyone working in or studying the built environment across the United States, and the people who read our content are the best source of feedback we have. Every message sent to the AuraPoint team is read by a real person. We do not use automated filters to discard technical questions, and we do not outsource our editorial correspondence. If you write to us, you will receive a thoughtful response from someone who understands the difference between a moment frame and a braced frame, knows why the IBC and ASCE 7 matter to practicing engineers, and can speak to the nuances of seismic design categories versus wind exposure categories. What We're Happy to Hear About Corrections and clarifications are always welcome. Our guides — covering everything from dead, live, wind, and seismic load types to the specifics of foundation and footing design — are written to be accurate and current, but structural engineering is a living discipline. Building codes are updated on regular cycles, material standards evolve, and best practices shift. If you believe something in our Structural Basics content is outdated, incomplete, or technically misleading, please tell us specifically what the issue is, which guide it appears in, and what the correct information should be. We will review it against authoritative sources including ACI, AISC, AWC, and TMS standards, as well as the most recent IBC and ASCE 7 editions, and we will update the content if warranted. Content suggestions are equally valuable. If you are a practicing structural engineer and you notice that a topic critical to everyday practice — say, the detailing requirements for steel moment connections in high seismic zones, or the differences between spread footings and mat foundations in expansive soils — is missing or underdeveloped in our library, let us know. Our editorial roadmap is shaped in part by the real-world gaps that engineers, architects, and students tell us they encounter. General questions about our Structural Basics guides are also fair game. If you read our overview of shear walls, moment frames, and braced frames and came away with a follow-up question about how those systems interact with diaphragm design, or if our explanation of masonry structural behavior left you wanting more detail on unreinforced versus reinforced masonry, reach out. We may not be able to provide project-specific engineering advice — and we are clear that our content is educational, not a substitute for licensed professional engineering judgment — but we can point you toward the right section of our guides or let you know when expanded coverage is coming. Feedback on clarity and usability matters too. Our audience ranges from first-year engineering students encountering tributary area calculations for the first time to senior structural engineers refreshing their knowledge of connection details. If a section of a guide assumes too much prior knowledge, uses jargon without explanation, or presents a concept in a way that is technically correct but pedagogically confusing, that is something we genuinely want to fix. Tell us which guide, which section, and what felt unclear — the more specific, the better. How to Reach Us Send your message to our editorial team at the email address listed below. Please include a clear subject line — something like "Correction: Seismic Load Guide" or "Suggestion: Composite Deck Connections" — so we can route your message to the right person quickly. For corrections, include the specific guide title and, if possible, the section or paragraph you are referencing. For suggestions, a sentence or two explaining the gap you see and why it matters to your work is enormously helpful. We aim to respond to all messages within three to five business days. During periods of high volume — typically following a major code update cycle or after we publish a new guide series — response times may extend slightly, but we will always follow up. A Note on What We Do and Don't Provide AuraPoint is an educational resource. Our Structural Basics content — including our guides on load paths, structural materials, connection details, building codes, foundation types, and lateral systems — is designed to explain concepts, not to serve as engineering documentation or project-specific design guidance. We do not review drawings, stamp calculations, or provide opinions on specific construction projects. If you need licensed structural engineering services, please consult a registered professional engineer in your state. That said, if you are a student trying to understand a concept for coursework, a designer looking to deepen your technical vocabulary before a conversation with your structural engineer of record, or an enthusiast who simply finds the mechanics of how buildings stand up genuinely fascinating, our content and our team are here for you. Learn more about the full range of topics we cover in Structural Basics — and reach out anytime.